When Someone Else May Be Responsible for the Fire
Some wildfires are traced to a person or company, such as equipment that sparked or a fire that was not controlled. When that is the case, a renter may have a civil claim against that party for losses insurance does not fully cover, such as amounts above the policy limits or a deductible.
If you are considering a claim like this, a negligence case in California generally turns on four things you would have to be able to show through evidence. First, that the party owed a duty of care. Second, that it breached that duty, for example through equipment that sparked or a fire left uncontrolled. Third, that the breach caused the fire or its spread and reached your home, which is where records about how the fire began and moved come in. Fourth, the losses that resulted, which is where your receipts, photos and living-cost records come in. A fire, however destructive, does not by itself prove that anyone was careless.
The losses a civil claim may seek track what a displaced renter has actually lost: belongings, the extra cost of living elsewhere, and other losses the fire caused. Insurance payments and a civil claim can overlap, and how they are accounted for depends on the facts and the law that applies. The wildfire lawsuit attorney page explains how a California fire lawsuit is structured.
For a renter, the hard part is that the cause of a fire is often unclear for months. A conversation with our attorney can cover what is publicly known about the fire, which losses insurance has and has not paid, and whether the facts point toward a claim against someone.